2009/4/28 Hutton, Andrew <[email protected]>: > > I agree with Francois it would I assume be the Referred-by header that > contains the URI of the park server and as long as the UA can match this > against it's local configuration then this will be ok.
That would probably be more straightforward. But it assumes a particular way of achieving the feature. > I do think we should have a short description of the auto-retrieve > procedure including an example message flow in the draft. I'm still not entirely convinced that it belongs in this draft, although I agree it is an important aspect to consider in an implementation. I'm also not sure that it is within scope for BLISS, given that it does seem to be trying to standardise a feature over and above the level needed for 'basic interoperability'. However, I am open to persuasion! To that end, I'd appreciate contributions of text / message flows. Michael _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
