The reason I suggest that a client be able to specify the duration in
the park request is that you may have a client implementing a service
where it may want to override the duration of the default timer on the
call park server. 

Scott 

-----Original Message-----
From: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) 
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 10:51 AM
To: Michael Procter; Orton, Scott (RICH1:B620)
Cc: [email protected]; Worley, Dale (BL60:9D30)
Subject: RE: Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04
(AutoRetrieve proposal)

On the firest part, you are correct, it's not new protocol.

But a default timer, and a paragraph on Auto-Retrieve is exactly the
type of information that is appropriate for an INFORMATIONAL draft.

Introducing phones that don't have an Auto-retrieve feature for call
park will cause significant headaches in the real world.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Procter [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 08:46
> To: Orton, Scott (RICH1:B620)
> Cc: [email protected]; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); Worley, Dale 
> (BL60:9D30)
> Subject: Re: Comments on
> draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04 (AutoRetrieve proposal)
> 
> Hi Scott,
> 
> 
> 2009/4/24 Scott Orton <[email protected]>:
> > I would like to add the ability to specify an auto-retrieve timer 
> > value both in the park request and by policy on the call
> park server. 
> > This could be accomplished by adding a new autoretrieve tag to the 
> > url. The value of the tag would be 1*digit and contain the time in 
> > seconds until the parked call is sent back to the user that
> parked the call.
> 
> I can certainly see merit in a park server implementing a policy like 
> this, but I am not sure we need to define anything at the protocol 
> level.  In particular, I don't see a particularly strong reason to 
> allow the parking UA to set (or even merely suggest) how long the call

> should be parked for.
> That strikes me as something that can and should be handled by the 
> park server.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael
> 
_______________________________________________
BLISS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss

Reply via email to