Actually, I don't think it would be History-Info: I think it would be Referred-by header (RFC 3892). It would just say it's the Park Server.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Procter [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:11 > To: Hutton, Andrew > Cc: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); [email protected]; Orton, > Scott (RICH1:B620) > Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on > draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04(AutoRetrieve proposal) > > 2009/4/27 Hutton, Andrew <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > I think the auto-retrieve timer is really something that would be > > implemented in the park server and the phone does not need to know > > anything about it. > > Yes, that was my thought. > > > What might be useful from the parking UA's perspective is that when > > the call is auto-retrieved (i.e. the park server refer's > the call back > > to the parking UA or possibly a different UA) that the resulting > > INVITE contains an indication that the INVITE is a result of the > > auto-retrieve initiated by the park server. Could we say something > > about this in the draft? > > Surely this is something that could be addressed with History-Info? > > Michael > _______________________________________________ BLISS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
