Gavin, you can add me to the list as well.
Regards, Peter On 22 January 2013 10:04, Gavin McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > As promised, a VM is ready to go. > > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access. > > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM > as a whole. > > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is > done here with my infra > hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may. > > Thanks > > Gav... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gary Martin [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > > > > On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > > >> > > >> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking > > >> about > > > a > > >> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive. > > >> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user > > > perception), but > > >> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more > > > important at > > >> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will > > >> achieve some progress. > > >> > > > I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just the backlog of projects > > > jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy. > > > > > > I will start the VM today. > > > > > > what service urls do you want? > > > > > > I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls > > > of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ? > > > > The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be > > worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with > > something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/ > > > > In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with > > would probably be: > > > > * current - the latest official release > > * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day > > > > I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed > > over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of > that > > against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such > a > > demo. > > > > Cheers, > > Gary > >
