Hi Gavin Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).
Cheers, matevz On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi All, > > As promised, a VM is ready to go. > > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access. > > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM > as a whole. > > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is > done here with my infra > hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may. > > Thanks > > Gav... > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gary Martin [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party >> >> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote: >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party >>>> >>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking >>>> about >>> a >>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive. >>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user >>> perception), but >>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more >>> important at >>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will >>>> achieve some progress. >>>> >>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just the backlog of projects >>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy. >>> >>> I will start the VM today. >>> >>> what service urls do you want? >>> >>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls >>> of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ? >> >> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be >> worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with >> something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/ >> >> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with >> would probably be: >> >> * current - the latest official release >> * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day >> >> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed >> over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of > that >> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such > a >> demo. >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >
