> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrej Golcov [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 2:37 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third > party) > > Hi Gavin, > > Please also add my name on the list. > SSH pub key is in ldap. >
Sorry for delay, you should now have ssh access to bloodhound-vm2.aapche.org If you need sudo, you'll need to set up orthrus (opie) first. See s.apache.org/opie HTH Gav... > Regards, Andrej > > On 6 February 2013 10:55, Matevž Bradač <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gavin > > > > Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key). > > > > Cheers, > > matevz > > > > On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> As promised, a VM is ready to go. > >> > >> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access. > >> > >> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the > >> demo VM as a whole. > >> > >> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my > >> work is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on > >> with my bh hat on if I may. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Gav... > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > >>> > >>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM > >>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > >>>>> > >>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm > >>>>> talking about > >>>> a > >>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive. > >>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user > >>>> perception), but > >>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more > >>>> important at > >>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will > >>>>> achieve some progress. > >>>>> > >>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just the backlog of projects > >>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us > busy. > >>>> > >>>> I will start the VM today. > >>>> > >>>> what service urls do you want? > >>>> > >>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service > >>>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ? > >>> > >>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might > >>> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the > >>> demos with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/ > >>> > >>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start > >>> with would probably be: > >>> > >>> * current - the latest official release > >>> * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day > >>> > >>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release > >>> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any > >>> benefit of > >> that > >>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of > >>> such > >> a > >>> demo. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Gary > >> > >
