> -----Original Message----- > From: Jure Zitnik [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 4:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third > party) > > On 1/22/13 10:04 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > As promised, a VM is ready to go. > > > > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access. > > > > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the > > demo VM as a whole. > > I'm interested in helping to maintain the demo VM so please add me to the > list.
Please add a ssh pub key to id.apache.org and then try logging in to bloodhound-vm2.a.o Thanks Gav... > > Cheers, > Jure > > > > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work > > is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on with my > > bh hat on if I may. > > > > Thanks > > > > Gav... > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Gary Martin [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > >> > >> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party > >>>> > >>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking > >>>> about > >>> a > >>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive. > >>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user > >>> perception), but > >>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more > >>> important at > >>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will > >>>> achieve some progress. > >>>> > >>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just the backlog of projects > >>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us > busy. > >>> > >>> I will start the VM today. > >>> > >>> what service urls do you want? > >>> > >>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service > >>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ? > >> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might > >> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos > >> with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/ > >> > >> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start > >> with would probably be: > >> > >> * current - the latest official release > >> * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day > >> > >> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release > >> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any > >> benefit of > > that > >> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of > >> such > > a > >> demo. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Gary
