On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Egon Willighagen <
[email protected]> wrote:
> This is why I mentioned earlier in this thread, and several times in
> the past, that it is important that BO tools get adopted by (Linux)
> distributions (I am not aware of such a Open Standard for packaging
> for MS-Windows)... packagers from projects that do have such a
> standard, know how to get your program X to follow one or more of the
> above sketched standards...
>
> MPQC is not a BO tool (and nor are the other QM codes). It would presumably
be at least polite to approach the authors before attempting to do such
packaging. What are the ethics and legalities of doing things like this?
Clearly thisw could be valuable but there would presumably be testing and
otehr things required.
--
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
