> > This is why I mentioned earlier in this thread, and several times in > > the past, that it is important that BO tools get adopted by (Linux) > > distributions (I am not aware of such a Open Standard for packaging > > for MS-Windows)... packagers from projects that do have such a > > standard, know how to get your program X to follow one or more of the > > above sketched standards... > > > MPQC is not a BO tool (and nor are the other QM codes). It would presumably > be at least polite to approach the authors before attempting to do such > packaging. What are the ethics and legalities of doing things like this? > Clearly thisw could be valuable but there would presumably be testing and > otehr things required.
1. MPQC is GPL software => anybody may redistribute it in binary or source form without permission 2. If you're going to create LiveCD, it would be reasonable to include as free many software (having appropriate quality!) as it possible -- Regards, Konstantin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
