Hello Florian,

Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:32:42 +0100,
Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> Charles-H.Schulz wrote on 2012-02-06 18:25:
> 
> > Private sending first. Attached are a set of similar yet simplified
> > community bylaws. What was modified:
> 
> sorry for being so late on this, Charles. Replying in public, since I 
> think the topic is interesting to everyone.
> 
> Our statutes (http://documentfoundation.org/statutes.pdf) foresee at 
> various places, that we have so-called Community Bylaws. Although the 
> same term is used, it is not necessarily the same as we have
> currently in the wiki. The wiki page of the same title served as
> basis for the statutes, so some parts have already been incorporated.
> 
> The main points in the statutes where the Community Bylaws are
> mentioned are the following:
> 
> - § 10 III 1: "Further details on admittance or exclusion from the
> board of trustees shall be regulated in the community bylaws, which
> are enacted by the board of directors."
> 
> - § 12 V: "Details on admittance and exclusion from the membership 
> committee shall be regulated in the bylaws which are enacted by the 
> board of directors."
> 
> I think we should start with a blank document that only contains 
> regulations as outlined above. It does not harm if we add some more
> to this document. However, keep in mind the following things:
> 
> 1. Nothing that's already mentioned in the statutes should be
> mentioned again in the bylaws.
> 

I disagree ; we need clear bylaws that are easily understandable by
everyone. 


> 2. Regulations in the bylaws cannot be contradictory to the statutes.

Sure that is very important. 

> 
> 3. After the initial set-up, per § 10 III 2 the board can *not* just 
> change them. We need a vote by the members, and looking at the 
> participation rate during the LibOCon voting, we should not expect
> that everyone replies upon first request. ;-)

But it makes sense anyway :-)
> 
> So, my proposal would be to start with a lightweight Community
> Bylaws. Other "best practices" might fit into separate documents that
> are not subject to such requirements.

Well, I disagree. I think that if you look at our present bylaws
they're mostly valid but only specific things need to be modified and
simplified.

Best,
Charles. 

> 
> Florian
> 



-- 
Charles-H. Schulz
Member of the Board of Directors,
The Document Foundation.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to