Hi Charles, Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2012-02-27 13:11:
Well, I disagree. I think that if you look at our present bylaws they're mostly valid but only specific things need to be modified and simplified.
I am talking about the "Community Bylaws" that are mentioned in our statutes. Those we need to have according to the statutes, and those should contain doubled content, I think this is rather important, so my points stay valid. :-) It's more a legal issue here.
What we can do, in addition, is a combined document that (legally not binding, not referenced in the statutes) outlines all rules in a single document.
However, first, we need the community bylaws, IMHO in the way I described it and the statutes require it.
Florian -- Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> Chairman of the Board at The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
