Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:18:34 +0100, Florian Effenberger <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi Charles, > > Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2012-02-27 13:11: > > Well, I disagree. I think that if you look at our present bylaws > > they're mostly valid but only specific things need to be modified > > and simplified. > > I am talking about the "Community Bylaws" that are mentioned in our > statutes. Those we need to have according to the statutes, and those > should contain doubled content, I think this is rather important, so > my points stay valid. :-) It's more a legal issue here. > Okay, so you need specific added content to the Statutes, am I getting this right? > What we can do, in addition, is a combined document that (legally not > binding, not referenced in the statutes) outlines all rules in a > single document. > > However, first, we need the community bylaws, IMHO in the way I > described it and the statutes require it. the community bylaws we have, we need them to be modified a bit . So we could do the following: * The statutes + the community bylaws that are relevant in them (the "lightweight" version) * The community bylaws as we know them, on the wiki but we need some points to be modified. Did I get this right? Best, Charles. > > Florian > -- Charles-H. Schulz Member of the Board of Directors, The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
