I've added a few forums to the ideas.openid.net: - Ideas - Usability - Developers - Marketing - Security - Foundation - Platforms & Implementing
Let me know what you think about these general areas. I'd like to keep the number of forums limited for now, but I think these reflect areas that I've seen come up on the mailing list in the past few months. I could also link these to appropriate mailing lists if that would be useful. Once we have AT MINIMUM one topic per forum, I think we could consider putting up the feedback tab. Thus, go to it! Start filling in topics! ;) Chris On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > And as soon as we’ve got it “seeded” we should put the feedback widget on > the site to encourage feedback. Right now its buried too deep to > proactively attract feedback. > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Brian Kissel > *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:56 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki? > > > > I’d suggest seeding with some of the areas we’ve talked about as priorities > for 2009 to see if what we think is important is consistent with what the > members and site visitors feel is important: > > > > · *1H 2009 Priorities* > > o Agree on best practices for UX, major OPs agree to consistently enable > and support this UX, communicate to RPs > > o Agree on phase 1, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs > consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security, other?) > > o Improve developer resources > > o Develop and communicate a more clear and cohesive security strategy: > technology, security community engagement, education, and marcom > > o Visible reference deployments in targeted segments: blogs, social > networking, media, entertainment, sports, personal productivity, and > affinity groups > > o Clear and consistent trademark and brand strategy, especially for B2B > (OP to RP) initially > > o OIDF organization on sound financial footing, appropriate professional > staff in place, executing on the agreed to priorities and programs > > o Begin market research on new market segments: retail, government, > education – leverage successes and lessons learned in Japan and Europe > > > > · *2H 2009 Priorities* > > o Continue to enhance UX and data offerings (friends, activity stream, > other) > > o Agree on phase 2, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs > consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security, other?) > > o Enhance security and other capabilities (data, PCI compliance, > non-repudiation, etc.) as required for potential new markets: retail, > government, education, etc. > > o Begin mainstream market awareness and educational outreach (when > required goals above are achieved) > > o Leverage reference deployments (1H goal) into mainstream adoption in > targeted segments: blogs, social networking, media, entertainment, sports, > personal productivity, and affinity groups > > o Develop and implement B2C (RP to end user) OpenID brand and trademark > strategy > > o Assess and refine OIDF financial and operational structure as > necessary > > o Develop 2010 plan > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Chris Messina > *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:54 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki? > > > > What topics should we seed the discussions with? > > > > Also, my thinking is that Satisfaction should be used for general > user/customer support problems (i.e. when people have a problem with their > OpenID, yes, they should go to their provider, but if they forget who their > provider is, if it goes down, or any number of other problems, at least we > can aggregate common answers to such problems for the betterment of the > OpenID brand). > > > > For UserVoice, I think we use it to collect ideas and votes on those ideas > — both for the technology and the priorities of the foundation. Of course > nothing on UV will be binding, but these kinds of solutions have a lower > barrier to entry than joining a mailing list. > > > > Chris > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Scott Kveton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems like the best way to get questions is to put it up there so > people can enter them in. Topics make sense to me as well. I say get > it up as fast as possible to start taking feedback. > > - Scott > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:11 AM, David Recordon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey Brian, > > The feedback that I provided to Chris was that I thought we should start > > getting UserVoice active before we promote it so heavily on the site. > > Currently they're are two ideas, but if we can get up over ten or so I > > think it will become much clearly to new visitors how to use it and the > sort > > of thing that is expected. I also believe that we can setup "topics" in > > UserVoice and I'd encourage us to do so to separate ideas between the > > Foundation and technology. I also wonder how we plan to integrate > UserVoice > > and GetSatisfaction, or if we still do. > > Basically, I want us to have a plan and some engagement on UserVoice > before > > it becomes the most prominent thing on the site. > > --David > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Brian Kissel wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Chris has gotten UserVoice hooked up on the OpenID.net website, you can > see > > it at the bottom of the page under “Discuss/Ideas” Thanks Chris! > > > > <image002.png> > > > > I’m suggesting that we also implement the “feedback widget” which makes > it > > more clear how to use the feedback tool. You can see UserVoice’s widget > at > > UserVoice on the left hand side of the page. Anyone have concerns about > > implementing the “feedback widget” on our site? The advantage is that > this > > proactively encourages site visitors to provide feedback. The more > feedback > > we get the more we’ll know what the community is looking for from the > OIDF. > > > > <image003.jpg> > > > > Cheers, > > Brian > > ============== > > Brian Kissel > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > From: Chris Messina [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:09 PM > > To: Brian Kissel > > Cc: Marcus Nelson; Dave Recordon > > Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki? > > > > Just as we posted about moving the OpenID code repo to Google Code, I'd > like > > to put such a visible feature to the board list first. I can go ahead and > > make that request if you like. Recordon had more specific thoughts that > he > > might be willing to share when he returns this week. > > > > > > Chris > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > What about the “Feedback Widget,” what’s required to implement that? Any > > reason not to try it? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > > > ============== > > > > Brian Kissel > > > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > > > From: Chris Messina [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 6:03 PM > > To: Marcus Nelson > > Cc: Brian Kissel; Dave Recordon > > > > Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki? > > > > > > > > Sure, go for it. > > > > > > > > I simply haven't the time lately to do the kind of design/touch ups I'd > like > > to — so if you smooth the integration/design, that'd be swell. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Marcus Nelson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hey Guys -- > > > > You're very welcome! This is a great start, though the UV page looks a > > little plain. If it's okay with you, we'd like to spruce it up a bit to > > match the OpenID brand. Would that be okay? > > > > -- > > Marcus Nelson > > UserVoice.com - What do users really want? > > > > [email protected] > > mobile: 408.888.2657 > > skype: uservoice > > twitter: @marcusnelson > > > > blog: http://blog.uservoice.com > > twitter: http://twitter.com/uservoice > > feedback: http://uservoice.uservoice.com > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > Great to see that its up and running now under the “Ideas” link at the > > bottom of the page, thank you, but I’d guess that most people don’t take > the > > time to scroll to the bottom of the footer or even notice the “ideas” > link. > > The great thing about the “feedback widget” is that it proactively > > encourages feedback, which I think is what we want. Would also be good > to > > put this on the OIDF wiki site as well. What’s the downside of using the > > feedback widget? I’m seeing it more places and think it will be good for > > the OIDF to show that we’re proactively soliciting feedback, not to > mention > > that lots of good ideas will come from it as well as the relative > priorities > > of requests. > > > > > > > > By the way Marcus, thanks for your support with this as well, we really > > appreciate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <image001.jpg> > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > > > ============== > > > > Brian Kissel > > > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > > database 3976 (20090330) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ > > board mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > board mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Citizen-Participant & > Open Web Advocate > > factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3984 (20090402) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3984 (20090402) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > -- Chris Messina Citizen-Participant & Open Web Advocate factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
