I've added a few forums to the ideas.openid.net:
Ideas
Usability
Developers
Marketing
Security
Foundation
Platforms & Implementing
Let me know what you think about these general areas. I'd like to
keep the number of forums limited for now, but I think these reflect
areas that I've seen come up on the mailing list in the past few
months.
I could also link these to appropriate mailing lists if that would
be useful.
Once we have AT MINIMUM one topic per forum, I think we could
consider putting up the feedback tab.
Thus, go to it! Start filling in topics! ;)
Chris
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]>
wrote:
And as soon as we’ve got it “seeded” we should put the feedback
widget on the site to encourage feedback. Right now its buried too
deep to proactively attract feedback.
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Brian Kissel
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
I’d suggest seeding with some of the areas we’ve talked about as
priorities for 2009 to see if what we think is important is
consistent with what the members and site visitors feel is important:
· 1H 2009 Priorities
o Agree on best practices for UX, major OPs agree to consistently
enable and support this UX, communicate to RPs
o Agree on phase 1, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs
consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security,
other?)
o Improve developer resources
o Develop and communicate a more clear and cohesive security
strategy: technology, security community engagement, education, and
marcom
o Visible reference deployments in targeted segments: blogs,
social networking, media, entertainment, sports, personal
productivity, and affinity groups
o Clear and consistent trademark and brand strategy, especially
for B2B (OP to RP) initially
o OIDF organization on sound financial footing, appropriate
professional staff in place, executing on the agreed to priorities
and programs
o Begin market research on new market segments: retail,
government, education – leverage successes and lessons learned in
Japan and Europe
· 2H 2009 Priorities
o Continue to enhance UX and data offerings (friends, activity
stream, other)
o Agree on phase 2, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs
consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security,
other?)
o Enhance security and other capabilities (data, PCI compliance,
non-repudiation, etc.) as required for potential new markets:
retail, government, education, etc.
o Begin mainstream market awareness and educational outreach (when
required goals above are achieved)
o Leverage reference deployments (1H goal) into mainstream
adoption in targeted segments: blogs, social networking, media,
entertainment, sports, personal productivity, and affinity groups
o Develop and implement B2C (RP to end user) OpenID brand and
trademark strategy
o Assess and refine OIDF financial and operational structure as
necessary
o Develop 2010 plan
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Chris Messina
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
What topics should we seed the discussions with?
Also, my thinking is that Satisfaction should be used for general
user/customer support problems (i.e. when people have a problem with
their OpenID, yes, they should go to their provider, but if they
forget who their provider is, if it goes down, or any number of
other problems, at least we can aggregate common answers to such
problems for the betterment of the OpenID brand).
For UserVoice, I think we use it to collect ideas and votes on those
ideas — both for the technology and the priorities of the
foundation. Of course nothing on UV will be binding, but these kinds
of solutions have a lower barrier to entry than joining a mailing
list.
Chris
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Scott Kveton <[email protected]>
wrote:
Seems like the best way to get questions is to put it up there so
people can enter them in. Topics make sense to me as well. I say get
it up as fast as possible to start taking feedback.
- Scott
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:11 AM, David Recordon
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Brian,
> The feedback that I provided to Chris was that I thought we should
start
> getting UserVoice active before we promote it so heavily on the
site.
> Currently they're are two ideas, but if we can get up over ten or
so I
> think it will become much clearly to new visitors how to use it
and the sort
> of thing that is expected. I also believe that we can setup
"topics" in
> UserVoice and I'd encourage us to do so to separate ideas between
the
> Foundation and technology. I also wonder how we plan to integrate
UserVoice
> and GetSatisfaction, or if we still do.
> Basically, I want us to have a plan and some engagement on
UserVoice before
> it becomes the most prominent thing on the site.
> --David
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Chris has gotten UserVoice hooked up on the OpenID.net website,
you can see
> it at the bottom of the page under “Discuss/Ideas” Thanks Chris!
>
> <image002.png>
>
> I’m suggesting that we also implement the “feedback widget” which
makes it
> more clear how to use the feedback tool. You can see UserVoice’s
widget at
> UserVoice on the left hand side of the page. Anyone have concerns
about
> implementing the “feedback widget” on our site? The advantage is
that this
> proactively encourages site visitors to provide feedback. The
more feedback
> we get the more we’ll know what the community is looking for from
the OIDF.
>
> <image003.jpg>
>
> Cheers,
> Brian
> ==============
> Brian Kissel
> Cell: 503.866.4424
> Fax: 503.296.5502
>
> From: Chris Messina [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:09 PM
> To: Brian Kissel
> Cc: Marcus Nelson; Dave Recordon
> Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
>
> Just as we posted about moving the OpenID code repo to Google
Code, I'd like
> to put such a visible feature to the board list first. I can go
ahead and
> make that request if you like. Recordon had more specific thoughts
that he
> might be willing to share when he returns this week.
>
>
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brian Kissel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What about the “Feedback Widget,” what’s required to implement
that? Any
> reason not to try it?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> ==============
>
> Brian Kissel
>
> Cell: 503.866.4424
>
> Fax: 503.296.5502
>
>
>
> From: Chris Messina [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 6:03 PM
> To: Marcus Nelson
> Cc: Brian Kissel; Dave Recordon
>
> Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
>
>
>
> Sure, go for it.
>
>
>
> I simply haven't the time lately to do the kind of design/touch
ups I'd like
> to — so if you smooth the integration/design, that'd be swell.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Marcus Nelson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Guys --
>
> You're very welcome! This is a great start, though the UV page
looks a
> little plain. If it's okay with you, we'd like to spruce it up a
bit to
> match the OpenID brand. Would that be okay?
>
> --
> Marcus Nelson
> UserVoice.com - What do users really want?
>
> [email protected]
> mobile: 408.888.2657
> skype: uservoice
> twitter: @marcusnelson
>
> blog: http://blog.uservoice.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/uservoice
> feedback: http://uservoice.uservoice.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Brian Kissel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
>
> Great to see that its up and running now under the “Ideas” link at
the
> bottom of the page, thank you, but I’d guess that most people
don’t take the
> time to scroll to the bottom of the footer or even notice the
“ideas” link.
> The great thing about the “feedback widget” is that it proactively
> encourages feedback, which I think is what we want. Would also be
good to
> put this on the OIDF wiki site as well. What’s the downside of
using the
> feedback widget? I’m seeing it more places and think it will be
good for
> the OIDF to show that we’re proactively soliciting feedback, not
to mention
> that lots of good ideas will come from it as well as the relative
priorities
> of requests.
>
>
>
> By the way Marcus, thanks for your support with this as well, we
really
> appreciate it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> ==============
>
> Brian Kissel
>
> Cell: 503.866.4424
>
> Fax: 503.296.5502
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
> database 3976 (20090330) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate
factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3984 (20090402) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3984 (20090402) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate
factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board