> On 9月15日, 上午2時33分, "alinome.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> l tinkered several times with the BOLTMlink function and wondered why >> the "nofollow" is added by default. What is the reason? This is a standard spam prevention method, recommended by most wiki help sites. Basically it stops a spider from indexing an external link. This means someone does not get any benefit from adding a spam link to your site--as it won't lead to improved rankings for their site or whatever. >> Linly needs target=_blank by default and I need class=external by >> default (to make external links look different than internals). And I >> don't want rel=nofollow... :-) In the next release we will have two new config values: LinkIntAttr and LinkExtAttr. Either can be set in site.config or by any other of the normal mechanisms. The default settings will be the same as now (nothing/rel=nofollow) but they can be changed exactly as you wish above. >> I think the final solution will be a common centralized system to >> choose, for every BoltWire tag, what arguments are allowed, what >> arguments are mandatory and what arguments have to be translated and >> how (there's another thread of mine on this suggestion). The >> webmaster could control any single parameter editing some arrays in >> config.php, without worrying about BoltWire upgrades. We can add other config values for other types of input on a case by case basis. Just let me know what you need. I don't want to add a bunch of stuff that's not really needed. > 2008/9/14 Linly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Or should we have a needing-approved function that any link is invalid > (with an icon) by default, admin can chose to approve it or not. This > mechanism (needing-approved function) can be used in forms, links, > page create, member register ... This is just a thought. Yes, this would be a good idea. I would need to study how it is normally done in other wiki's and find a way to replicate that in BoltWire. There has not been a request for this, and to be honest, I'd prefer to add a simple hook in the code so a plugin could be developed, than to write it all up myself and put it in the core. But let me know what you think... I'm happy to oblige if there's a significant demand. Cheers, Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
