On Mar 17, 12:51 pm, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> How about adding a second level link under docs entitled examples... > >> Go form there. > > >> I'd be willing to set it up... > > > I'd probably use: Information Documentation Code > > I'm thinking under docs, Examples... I just put something up. Take a > look... Probably need to make it more inviting for people to put up > their own code snippets...
What about creating some sections like "conditions", "searches", "fmt's & templates", "forms" etc. Sections would make it easier to decide if "Rolling Dice" is of interest to the reader or not. I would then display a link "add" in each section. The page could state in the beginning "... user-contributed examples ... feel free to add your own ...". That would make it quite clear what it's all about. I would do it myself but as you only listed it under docs but did not put it in the docs hierarchy I can't. > As for Blueprints, I was thinking we would use that word for the > Solutions/Extensions area. Though I suspect extension is probably more > clear (if less colorful) to most people... > > > Additional edit access (if needed) and prolonged stamps life would be > > good. My only concern is that there would temporarily be dead links > > and broken pages. That's why I initially thought of a copy. Yet, in > > that case one had to monitor changes on BoltWire.com to put them into > > the copy afterwards. Not sure what is the preferred way to do it. > > I don't know either. If you are just talking about improving some > page's content--go for it. Only post a question if you are not sure > about some change. If you are talking major restructuring of the > navigation, I think it would be better to post your suggestions to the > list first. I don't think there are major problems with our > navigation--our biggest problems are keeping content current and > complete. And maybe concise... :) But that's just my opinion. My order would be structure, nomenclature, conciseness, currentness, completeness. Investing time in planning and organization often pays off twice. But I'm still convinced that your valuable cognitive processing time should be mostly reserved for programming BoltWire. That's why I don't want to start a longer discussion right now. Give me some time, I have several ideas that I would like to elaborate. Is it possible that you send me a zipped copy of the BoltWire field that would allow me to test-drive some of them? Or are there non-public parts to it..? > > Here, I was talking (primarily) about the barn/system/pages which I > > would strip their verbosity off. Though some pages on BoltWire.com > > might need this as well. Maybe the site first, then the system pages. > > If it is a system page, you would have to send me suggestions by > email, as my zips are always created off of my local copy. A copy > wouldn't work too well, as I would have to compare the two for every > page and hunt for differences. I've put it on my to do list. Markus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
