[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13630989#comment-13630989
]
Jiannan Wang commented on BOOKKEEPER-438:
-----------------------------------------
{quote}
Ok, but we should fix this before 4.3.0, so could you create a new jira to fix
this as a blocker for 4.3.0
{quote}
It would be better to do it. But personally, I would prefer not to maintain
original ledger id generation fashion for 64bits since it's inefficient. And
thinking more about the details, it's not straightforward to extend previous
fashion (I mean by using ephemeral sequential znode).
> Move ledger id generation out of LedgerManager
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-438
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-438
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-server, hedwig-server
> Reporter: Sijie Guo
> Assignee: Jiannan Wang
> Fix For: 4.3.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-438.patch, BOOKKEEPER-438.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-438.patch, BOOKKEEPER-438.patch, BOOKKEEPER-438.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-438.patch, BOOKKEEPER-438.patch, BOOKKEEPER-438.patch
>
>
> Move id generation out of LedgerManager to ensure different ledger manager
> implementation shared same ledger id space in ZooKeeper, which is necessary
> for migration between different ledger managers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
