Re: [Boost-docs] Integrating BoostBook documentation with HTML documentation

[Beman Dawes]

At 09:48 PM 1/19/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:

>> -- Footer should have a "revised" date. I like the horizon rule, too.
>
>A "generated" date would be easy; a "revised" date isn't so easy, because
>it's not trivial to figure out when something used in the list changed.

For this page it probably isn't a problem, but for regular doc pages I personally like to know the revision date.

>> Have you check to verify there won't be any CVS "churn" once this becomes
>> something that is checked into CVS? (Unless, of course, there is a real
>> change on the page.)
>
>I'm not expecting this page to go into CVS, but to be autogenerated nightly
>along with the rest of the documentation.

I guess I'm still unsure how the generated HTML docs are going to be integrated with the rest of the web site and CVS.

My understanding was that the docs in formats other than HTML would go on a separate web site, but that the source and HTML would be on the regular site. I assumed that also meant they would be in the regular CVS.

--Beman




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs