Doug Gregor wrote:
I'd most like to avoid unintentional look & feel differences. You could go off an create your own CSS to use, but it's possible that the rest of us would be perfectly happy if you just put the changes into the common look & feel. So unless there's a real disagreement over L&F issues, why not update the existing CSS?
Doug
I happen to like the look/feel of Joel's documentation, but it is quite a departure from the existing look/feel. We would need a broad consensus before integrating these changes into boost's CSS.
So here is an example of boost's existing look-n-feel: http://tinyurl.com/4wj6f
And here is an example of Joel's new look-n-feel: http://boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/libs/xpressive
(Of course, real boost documentation would use the c++boost image and have the "Home Libraries People FAQ More" links.)
So what do people think? How do people feel about: - the fonts? - the colors? - the navigation icons? - the text layout? - the text justification?
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
