"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doug Gregor wrote: >> I'd most like to avoid unintentional look & feel differences. You >> could go off an create your own CSS to use, but it's possible that >> the rest of us would be perfectly happy if you just put the changes >> into the common look & feel. So unless there's a real disagreement >> over L&F issues, why not update the existing CSS? >> Doug >> > > I happen to like the look/feel of Joel's documentation, but it is > quite a departure from the existing look/feel. We would need a broad > consensus before integrating these changes into boost's CSS. > > So here is an example of boost's existing look-n-feel: > http://tinyurl.com/4wj6f > > And here is an example of Joel's new look-n-feel: > http://boost-sandbox.sourceforge.net/libs/xpressive
Joel's look-and-feel is really nice. I like it way better than the old Spirit look and find it much closer to the pre-BoostBook documentation traditions of Boost (e.g. http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/utility.htm) than the "existing Boost look-n-feel," probably because of the lightweight black-on-white theme. If I have any criticism, I'd have to say that boldifying links may over-emphasize them. But that is really a minor point. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
