Vladimir Prus wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Boostbook's icons are more professional IMO, and I like that they are a
tad larger than Spirit's, but they have that transparency problem.
Anybody with a graphics editor want to touch them up?
>
> Please see the attachment. At least for me, the transparency is now OK.
Hi,
Looking at the icons more closely, I have to say I'm still not happy
with the icons. The icons are a bit blurred. The sizes are not
consistent (caution is smaller than the rest). There is no clear
distinction between caution, important and warning (perhaps just
one icon for these 3 should suffice?). The three icons all use
the exclamation point. It should be readily apparent in one glance
what the icon means. This is not so, in this case.
Also, as I mentioned in my other post, we also need a high-res
(preferably vector based) versions for PDF files to avoid the
jaggies.
I'll see if I can come up with some icons. IMO, we only need:
1) note (detail)
2) tip (info)
3) important (alert, warning, caution)
Spirit had a fourth: "detail", but after pondering about it, I
think this is redundant. note and detail can be merged.
Thoughts? Comments?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
