Eric Niebler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> OK, done. Put your footnotes in a block like this: [footnote This
>>> is a footnote].
>> Any chance of separating footnotes from body text, as ReST allows?
>> I'm writing along and here[#footnote_ref] is a footnote.
>> .. [#footnote_ref] This is the text of that footnote.
>
>
> That would be considerably more difficult, since it doesn't align very
> well with DocBook's intrinsic support for footnotes. So for now, no.
Ah, no intermediate quickbook DOM.
Well, as long as we're being slaves to the DocBook structure, why not
have some standard syntax for new elements so we don't have to escape
to XML or modify the QB grammar every time we want to do something
new? In fact, why isn't
[xxx ... ]
automatically equivalent to
<xxx> .... </xxx>
when xxx is not already given special meaning by QB?
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
