Joel de Guzman wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
I think a better, saner way to do this might be like:
[phrase:xyzzy Blah blah blah]
which would be treated as phrase-level markup and get expanded into:
<xyzzy>Blah blah blah</xyzzy>
Comments?
Sounds good to me. Some questions:
1) Does phrase/block really matter? why not simply reflect them
and let the xml processor do the syntax check. So:
[xml:xyzzy Blah blah blah]
Mainly, I was thinking about how we would fit it into QB's grammar. The
rule for this will have to live in either block_grammar<> or
phrase_grammar<>, no?
2) how do we support attributes?
[xml:xyzzy(attrib1="xxx", attrib2="yyy") Blah blah blah]
?
Sure, that would work.
--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
