Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Sounds good to me. Some questions:
1) Does phrase/block really matter? why not simply reflect them
and let the xml processor do the syntax check. So:
[xml:xyzzy Blah blah blah]
Mainly, I was thinking about how we would fit it into QB's grammar. The
rule for this will have to live in either block_grammar<> or
phrase_grammar<>, no?
Both? To be specific, in phrase_markup rule of phrase_grammar
and block_markup rule of block_grammar.
Cheers,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
