I wish I had time to write this message right, so pardon my clumsy delivery.
QB has quite a few advantages in terms of semantic capability, especialy where C++ is concerned. On the other hand: I think ReST designers have devoted a little more effort to keeping the documents readable as plain text. I wonder if we can learn anything from them there? ReST is written in Python, which is IMO a far superior language to C++ for DOM traversal/manipulation (it's too dynamically polymorphic a problem to be handled nicely in C++ IMO). Maybe we should be thinking about slapping a Python backend on QB? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
