David Abrahams wrote: > Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> James Mansion wrote: >>>> One big advantage of a formal syntax is that we are >>>> able to analyze the syntax in a high level. >>> I really like this, but I wish that the implementation >>> created a formal AST and then used a visitor or similar. >>> >>> It might then be possible to add alternate back ends >>> that don't require the use of XSLT. I confess that I'm >>> finding getting a working docbook chain put together >>> challenging. :-( >>> >>> So tempting to change it to generate the style of HTMLDOC >>> directly, for example. >> Wouldn't this (AST generation + backend) be solving the wrong >> problem? I think the problem is the need for an easy to use >> installer that will put together a working tool chain. Rene >> did some work on that. It would be good if someone brings >> this to a good conclusion. > > Why is the installation of a complicated and slow toolchain the right > problem to be solving?
Because it involves the least amount of investment in terms of coding? Anyway, rest assured, I'm listening intently to all the messages (arguments and counter arguments). Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
