> One big advantage of a formal syntax is that we are > able to analyze the syntax in a high level.
I really like this, but I wish that the implementation created a formal AST and then used a visitor or similar. It might then be possible to add alternate back ends that don't require the use of XSLT. I confess that I'm finding getting a working docbook chain put together challenging. :-( So tempting to change it to generate the style of HTMLDOC directly, for example. BTW I really appreciate having something which supports shorthand for things that would otherwise need XML that can also diagnose syntax errors. I just wish that there were some more documentation on BoostDoc on how to set things up outside of the Boost build tree and bjam. James _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
