Glen Knowles wrote: [...] > The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails > the boost requirements as shown. > http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Common_Public_License
Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the reminder. "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather subjective, don't you think? As for "Must not require that the source code be available for execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, what's the problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
