Glen Knowles wrote: [...] > Now you're arguing that the boost license requirements should be > changed in order to make them compatible with the CPL? That's a bit of > a stretch, especially since I like the boost requirements as they are.
Frankly, I think that boost requirements make no sense. As an "individual" (poor one ;-) ), I'd rather go this way: http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg36819.php ([boost] Re: boost vs. The Lawyers (non-technical)) http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg46093.php ([boost] Re: Legal issues and licensing -- again) OTOH, from "commercial" (and "OSS community") POV, I'd go CPL. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
