Peter Dimov wrote: [...] > > The answers to questions 12 and 18 from > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html > > seem problematic.
Well, http://ntxshape.sourceforge.net/opensource.html WRT q12: <quote> The Lesser GPL used to be called the Library GPL. For historical reasons this license still refers to the software application as "the Library" which can be confusing for licensees. Also, a licensee is allowed to convert the Lesser GPL to a full GPL, after which their enhancements could not be incorporated back into our version of the software. So, for us, LGPL is out. </quote> WRT q18: <quote> This license strikes a good balance between making the source code available for use in commercial situations, while at the same time requiring that modifications / enhancements be published under the same license (thereby enabling all good enhancements to find their way back to us). </quote> regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
