Alexander Terekhov wrote: > Glen Knowles wrote: > [...] >> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails >> the boost requirements as shown. >> http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Common_Public_License > > Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the > reminder. "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather > subjective, > don't you think? As for "Must not require that the source code be > available for execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, > what's the problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.
The answers to questions 12 and 18 from http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html seem problematic. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
