Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In general, they are released when all of Boost is ready. I think >> it would be a *really* good idea for Boost to do at least one minor >> version release shortly after any major version release. Now that >> we have a reasonable testing strategy it should be relatively easy. >> Boost 1.30.0 went out with several bugs IIRC. > >> Until we get our act together, I would suggest you supply people >> with a Boost patch. Use "BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME" instead of >> "typename" so you don't break VC6. Sorry, > > A fixed release would be great indeed. In the mean time, I'm going to > provide the patch as you suggest, although it's far from a perfect > solution of course..
What does everybody think about doing a 1.30.1 release "RSN?" I don't think there's much to it, unless people have been checking things into the 1.30 branch unintentionally. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
