>Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> In general, they are released when all of Boost is ready. I think >>> it would be a *really* good idea for Boost to do at least one minor >>> version release shortly after any major version release. Now that >>> we have a reasonable testing strategy it should be relatively easy. >>> Boost 1.30.0 went out with several bugs IIRC. >> >>> Until we get our act together, I would suggest you supply people >>> with a Boost patch. Use "BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME" instead of >>> "typename" so you don't break VC6. Sorry, >> >> A fixed release would be great indeed. In the mean time, I'm going to >> provide the patch as you suggest, although it's far from a perfect >> solution of course.. > >What does everybody think about doing a 1.30.1 release "RSN?"
What would be the advantage of doing a 1.30.1 release rather than a 1.31.0 release?
Seems like we are very close to being ready to do a 1.31.0 release. One new library has been added since 1.30.0, at least two libraries have had interface upgrades, and a large number of bugs have been fixed in numerous libraries.
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
