Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: > >> > [Beman Dawes] >> > Hum... You must be seeing some way of getting a 1.30.1 release out >> > that eludes me. What would go into 1.30.1? > >> Exactly what's on the end of the RC_1_30_0 branch plus whatever >> additional small fixes were deemed important and can be applied in a >> day or two; release to happen in a week. > > Spirit has also just released its next version, should this also be > integrated into any boost 1.30.1?
No. Those are not *critical* fixes. > [I will ask same question on Spirit list, and direct discussion back > here] > >> Only *critical* fixes to the 1.30.0 release. > > What about updated compiler configs? For instance, Borland released a > compiler update pretty much the same week that Boost 1.30 went out, so > several version checks fail. Any other compilers release a point > upgrade that can be easily integrated? > >> By releasing one week from now? > > Agressive dealine will certainly focus us on 'needs' not 'wants' <g> That would be the idea. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
