Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> David Abrahams wrote: >> Martin Wille writes: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>you wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Sounds fine to me. The only issue remaining is how we can get the >>>>testing infrastructure to start testing RC_1_30_0. I would like to >>>>see the results of a round of testing on the current CVS state of that >>>>branch before we commit to a 1.30.1 release, just to make sure it's >>>>viable. >>> >>>I'll run the tests for Linux and upload them as Linux-rc-1.30.0. >>>They should be available in a few hours. >> Can you arrange the html so that it shows regressions from the 1.30.0 >> release results? > > Hmm, I'd have to find out how I would do that. Is there already > some support for showing diffs between two versions of the test > result tables?
Yes. Beman? > If there isn't such a thing I would try to implement something that > reads two tables and marks the differences. That would take a day > or two, I guess. > > In the meantime I'll publish tests for the 1.30.0 release and the > for release candidate unmodified. I think the results are useful > even without having the differences marked. > > > Regards, > m > > PS: Linux-rc-1_30_0 is available now. I'll run the tests for > 1.30.0 release tonight. They will be available in about > 9 hours. Thanks! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
