Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 08:36 PM 7/15/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > > >Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >... > > > >> Hum... You must be seeing some way of getting a 1.30.1 release out > >> that eludes me. What would go into 1.30.1? > > > >Exactly what's on the end of the RC_1_30_0 branch plus whatever > >additional small fixes were deemed important and can be applied in a > >day or two; release to happen in a week. > > Ah! That is much more doable. > > >> Who will act as release manager? > > > >I guess I'd have to reluctantly volunteer, now that I've suggested it. > > Sounds like you just talked your way into a new job:-) > > So a schedule might look something like the following? > > -- 1.30.1 - Selected bug fixes only (details up to release manager). > Schedule: a week or two from now
I would be more hard-*ssed about it. A week. > -- 1.31.0 - New library, breaking interface changes, many fixes. > Schedule: TBA, but work is basically already well underway. Sounds fine to me. The only issue remaining is how we can get the testing infrastructure to start testing RC_1_30_0. I would like to see the results of a round of testing on the current CVS state of that branch before we commit to a 1.30.1 release, just to make sure it's viable. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
