On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:00:35AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As for Voting for Nader, again, unless you live in one of the
> > battle ground states (of which there are only 8 at last check) a
> > vote for Nader is a vote for Nader, it won't affect the outcome.
> Those 8 states account for more than 100 electoral college
> votes. This is a close election for Gore and Bush, and every little
> bit is going to count.
There are a lot more than eight, too; according to CNN's count as of
today, the too-close-to-call states are AR,FL,IA,MI,MN,MO,NH,NM,OR,PA,
TN,WA,WI, and WV, accounting for 154 electoral votes.
And the Republicans plan to start running pro-Nader ads on Monday in
OR,WA,and WI, according to an AP article this afternoon. You're deluding
yourself if you think it doesn't make a difference in those cases.
--
Andrea Leistra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we could put a man on the moon, why can't we do it again?
