John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Suffice to say, this recount is getting very interesting. Lots of fun to watch, too - perhaps moreso for those of us stuck with the results but who can't participate. :) A co-worker said that apparently there was an old law in Florida allowing you to change your vote if you swore to it being a mistake before a judge. Can anyone confirm/deny? The mind boggles - what if the Nader supporters (who one would presume by now must be considering cutting their losses) were given the choice to change their minds (for the small price of perjury - albeit unprovable)? There were more than enough Nader votes in Florida to tip the balance. Joshua
- RE: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: And so... Joshua Bell
- RE: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: A... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: A... TursiopsAmicus
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET R... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER Y... Doug Pensinger
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: A... TursiopsAmicus
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET R... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: A... Joshua Bell
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET Re: A... TomFODW
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER YET R... Andrea Leistra
- Re: Gore Should Be Ahead Re: IT AIN'T OVER Y... John D. Giorgis
