Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > Doug Pensinger wrote: > > > >OK, let me ask it this way: What do we think is the shape of the universe? > >Is it (roughly) an expanding sphere? Or is it not describable in terms of > >shape? > > > The correct answer is that the shape of the Universe can only be > described as a four-dimensional object that is so distorted > that it can't even fit into an Euclidean space of 4 dimensions. > > Do you understand some other representations of 4D objects in > our 3D space? Such as? What if you eliminated one dimension as you do in an engineering drawing? Doug (stupider and stupider, eh?)
- Stupid Astrophysics question Doug Pensinger
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Doug Pensinger
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Andrea Leistra
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question TomFODW
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Doug Pensinger
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Gord Sellar
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Richard Baker
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Steve Sloan
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Bemmzim
- [Bras] Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Julia Thompson
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Brad De Long
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Gord Sellar
