Steve Sloan wrote: > > >After taking so many graphics classes, I'm well aware of >the 3D equivalent of that, where you project 3D onto 2D in >perspective projection. > A cube, represented this way, would be: +-----------+ |\ /| | \ / | | \ / | | +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +---+ | | / \ | | / \ | |/ \| +-----------+ Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Andrea Leistra
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question TomFODW
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Doug Pensinger
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Gord Sellar
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Richard Baker
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Steve Sloan
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Bemmzim
- [Bras] Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Julia Thompson
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Brad De Long
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Gord Sellar
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question dendriite
- Re: Stupid Astrophysics question Gord Sellar
