On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
> At 10:24 14-12-00 -0800, Joshua wrote:
> >"Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > I take that to an extreme... I can't pick up another book until I've
> > > > finished the previous book even if I absolutely hate the book I am
> > > > reading.
> >
> >I'm not quite that extreme, but it is definitely a sign that a book is truly
> >bad when I can abandon it in mid read. Only a few have been that hideous.
>
>
> Delaney's _Dhalgren_ has a reputation as a book that no one ever reads past
> approximately page 100 (the book is 500 or 600 pages long).
The paperback copy I have is over 800 pages long, and I may take that as a
challenge when I finish some of the Clancy that's lying around still
unread. :)
If I do, I'll let y'all know how I do with it. (Maybe I should be reading
something else in parallel....)
Julia
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 TursiopsAmicus
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Charlie Bell
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Joshua Bell
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Reading books backwards Re... Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re... William T Goodall
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Sonja van Baardwijk Holten
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Jim Sharkey
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Alberto Monteiro
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Horn, John
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Chad Cooper
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 brighto
