on 15/12/00 3:21 am, Ronn Blankenship at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 10:24 14-12-00 -0800, Joshua wrote: >> "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> I take that to an extreme... I can't pick up another book until I've >>>> finished the previous book even if I absolutely hate the book I am >>>> reading. >> >> I'm not quite that extreme, but it is definitely a sign that a book is truly >> bad when I can abandon it in mid read. Only a few have been that hideous. > > > Delaney's _Dhalgren_ has a reputation as a book that no one ever reads past > approximately page 100 (the book is 500 or 600 pages long). I read it and thought it was quite good. I may even have read it twice! -- William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 TursiopsAmicus
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Charlie Bell
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Joshua Bell
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Reading books backwards Re... Julia Thompson
- Re: Reading books backwards Re... William T Goodall
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 19... Sonja van Baardwijk Holten
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Jim Sharkey
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Alberto Monteiro
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Horn, John
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Chad Cooper
- RE: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 Gord Sellar
- Re: Reading books backwards Re: 1984 brighto
