> > Behalf Of Charlie Bell > > Gautam, you either misread intent into what I first wrote, > > or you have a > > GIGANTIC chip on your shoulder. Either way, I respectfully > > ask that you > > either assume all my posts are humourous in intent (which > > they mostly are) > > and reply in kind, or not worthy of comment (and don't comment). > > > > Charlie > > OK. If there had been a smiley after that comment, I would not in any > way have been pissed by reading it. It seemed to be serious. > Therefore I took it seriously. Had I thought it humorous, I would > have taken it humorously. I'll take that as an apology, and consider this closed then. :o) Charlie
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Doug Pensinger
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard worki... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Gautam Mukunda
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Charlie Bell
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Gautam Mukunda
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Charlie Bell
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Gautam Mukunda
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Charlie Bell
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Gautam Mukunda
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Doug Pensinger
- Re: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... Adam C. Lipscomb
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard working?) Ronn Blankenship
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard worki... Charlie Bell
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard worki... Ronn Blankenship
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard working?) John D. Giorgis
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard worki... Ronn Blankenship
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard worki... Charlie Bell
- RE: American Attitudes (was Re: Hard w... John D. Giorgis
