On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the case of firearms, though, we aren't talking about likelihood to > kill, but rather the likelihood they will be used to kill someone, or > several someones. > > Judged strictly on likelihood to kill, my bookcase can kill someone if > it falls on him. But until I hear about a mass bookcase slaying, I > don't think stricter controls on it as a potential weapon are > warranted. There is a distinction between firearms and bookcases, though, and that is the purpose. Bookcase accidents don't usually happen because the intended use of a bookcase is not to push it towards a target. This means that some stupid person won't take someone else as a target and pretend pushing the bookcase towards that person as a "joke". Jean-Louis Couturier
- Re: 2nd Amendment John D. Giorgis
- Re: 2nd Amendment Marc Erickson
- Re: FBI data Dan Minette
- Re: FBI data Dean Forster
- Re: gun control (newbie) dendriite
- RE: Science has a new Martyr John D. Giorgis
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr dendriite
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Jean-Louis Couturier
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Jean-Louis Couturier
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- Advertising to Kids (was Re: Science has a n... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: Advertising to Kids (was Re: Science... Doug Pensinger
- Re: Advertising to Kids (was Re: Sci... Russell Chapman
- Re: Advertising to Kids (was Re... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Advertising to Kids (was Re... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Advertising to Kids (was Re: Science... Marc Erickson
