John wrote:
> Bzzt.   In classic Democratic spin, you have made impeachment about
> "lying".   Unfortunately, impeachment was not about lying, it was about
the
> "Rule of Law."   In particular, we had a President who publicly crowed
> about signing the "Violence Against Women Act" - an Act which was so
> abusive, that it gave any woman who simply *accused* a man of a sexual
> offence near-plenary powers to pursue that man's entire sexual history.
> This President then asserted that this Law should not apply to him, for
> various and sundry reasons.   After the Courts asserted that, in fact, the
> President is not above the Law (most especially Laws he very publicly
> supported and signed) - this President again asserted immunity by
> flagarantly refusing to comply with the Courts and then committing a
second
> offense of perjury.

*snip*

And now all we need is an argument about Headless Clone Ranching, and we'll
have gone full circle since I joined Brin-L.

Not criticizing, just observing.

You may now continue with your regularly scheduled debate.

Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 32384792



Reply via email to