In a message dated 6/16/01 1:15:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Were you planning on stepping up to the plate and
disputing my arguments as a whole, or are you going to
continue to pick at me where i'm perceived as weak? >>
I'm not aware of a requirement that I reply to every part of every one of
your voluminous posts in order to respond to one point I find worth
commenting upon.
Frankly, most of your arguments so far seem to me to boil down to "I am
right," "You must not believe in personal responsibility" and "You must not
know very much." This may be a mischaracterization, but it's my opinion based
on what I've read on the list. I just don't see much to reply to there in
terms of a logical argument or a debate over facts.
The quotes in question are bogus. A vague feeling on your part that they are
kind of like what someone might have said if they sort of favored gun control
is not proof of much of anything.
And if you don't want to be picked at for making weak points, don't make weak
points.
Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
