--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/16/01 1:15:46 PM Pacific
> Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << Were you planning on stepping up to the plate and
> disputing my arguments as a whole, or are you going
> to
> continue to pick at me where i'm perceived as weak?
> >>
>
> I'm not aware of a requirement that I reply to every
> part of every one of
> your voluminous posts in order to respond to one
> point I find worth
> commenting upon.
You exhaust a lot of attention on me for someone who
doesn't think my thoughts are worth comment.
>
> Frankly, most of your arguments so far seem to me to
> boil down to "I am
> right," "You must not believe in personal
> responsibility" and "You must not
> know very much." This may be a mischaracterization,
> but it's my opinion based
> on what I've read on the list. I just don't see much
> to reply to there in
> terms of a logical argument or a debate over facts.
>
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that were that
true, the people here with superior debating skills to
yours would have cut me down to a nub in less than 30+
posts.
> The quotes in question are bogus. A vague feeling on
> your part that they are
> kind of like what someone might have said if they
> sort of favored gun control
> is not proof of much of anything.
>
> And if you don't want to be picked at for making
> weak points, don't make weak
> points.
>
Ah, glad to have a concise ruling on that. "bogus".
Statistically, it's gonna happen. Must be nice to
stand in judgment while not actually offering anything
new.
dean
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
