Do we agree that the same can be said about people with the rank of
Lt.General?

Jeroen

So, Jeroen, you've demonstrated that some military officers agree with your
position.  So what?  The Pentagon isn't exactly keeping these weapons
around for fun.  The overwhelming consensus of military experts is that
those weapons are useful in the Korean peninsula.  The fact that you're
willing to selectively quote the evidence that's in your favor does not, in
fact, demonstrate that this is so.  It _might_ be so, but only a small
minority of officers would agree with that position.  This is hardly enough
to support your accusations of war crimes and other such stuff.  It seems
to me, is that you accept without questioning any evidence that puts the US
in a bad light, and discard without analysing any evidence used to defend
it.  You might want to explain why you consider _only_ web sites critical
of the American position to be valid.

Gautam

Reply via email to