On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:14:16AM +0200, Baardwijk, J. van
DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM wrote:
> So, you would either have to make that no-fly zone an extremely big
> one (so big that it gives you enough time to intercept a plane that
> enters the zone), or make it not so big and have figher jets flying
> around in it during a football game -- which would make a football
> game extremely expensive.
One possible solution I came up with is to have a 50-100 mile radius
"no-fly zone" around all major cities. The main problem is that you'd
have to abandon many (most?) of the current airports and rebuild them
in rural areas, and connect the airports to the cities by high-speed
trains. The cost would be huge. Of course, not counting human lives, the
cost of rebuilding the WTC is huge, so maybe it is worth it.
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://erikreuter.com/
