> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:30 PM > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nukes Not Considered for > Terrorist Retaliation > > Guess you were not around, back when a month with less than 1,400 > > messages was considered a relatively QUIET month... > > As opposed to say ~500 messages / Day? (in quiet times between books). Are those ~500 messages per day actual discussions, or are they to a large extent rants, flames and personal attacks (not entirely uncommon in newsgroups)? Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://go.to/brin-l
RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nukes Not Considered for Terrorist Retaliation
Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:35:50 -0700
- RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM
- RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfel... Gary Nunn
- RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... The Fool
- RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... The Fool
- Privacy and the Internet (was ... Andrew Crystall
- RE: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfel... dendriite
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... The Fool
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLBD/BGM/SVM/SGM
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfeld: Nu... The Fool
- Re: From NewsMax.com: Rumsfel... Russell Chapman
- Re: The _Great_ M*rm*n Flame W... Ronn Blankenship
